Research / Local Citations & Directories
§ 01

Citation audit.

What an audit actually pulls

Every public mention of the practice's Name, Address, and Phone number across the dental-specific directory ecosystem and the broader local-citation surface. ADA Find-A-Dentist, the relevant state dental society directory, the relevant specialty board directories (AAO Find an Orthodontist, AAOMS Locate a Surgeon, AAP Find a Periodontist, AAE Find an Endodontist, AAPD Find a Pediatric Dentist), Healthgrades, ZocDoc, Yelp, Google Business Profile, Bing Places, Apple Maps, plus general-business citations (BBB, Chamber of Commerce, local newspapers). Variants get logged: a missing suite designation here, a tracking number there, a legal-name-vs-brand-name split somewhere else.

The output is a ledger of every inconsistency, the source it appears on, the surface that carries the canonical value, and the fix path for each. The work is the local pack optimization foundation. Without a clean baseline, the downstream signals (the GBP ranking, the directory citation density, the local-pack triggering) all read noise. The local citations and directories hub covers the ecosystem map; this page covers the diagnostic that runs over it.

Which inconsistencies actually hurt

Address discrepancies on the highest-authority surfaces (ADA Find-A-Dentist, the relevant state dental society, Google Business Profile) carry the heaviest weight. Phone-number splits across surfaces (a tracking number on the GBP and the main number on directories) trigger entity-disambiguation problems in Google Maps and risk the automatic entity-merging that corrupts multi-practitioner GBPs. Name variants where the legal entity name and the brand name diverge across surfaces dilute the entity signal. Stale closed locations still listed on lesser directories carry lower per-citation weight but compound over time.

For DSO-scale groups, the multi-location surface multiplies the drift rate. Each location's GBP primary and secondary categories have to match the practitioner's actual scope. The risk surface at multi-practitioner facilities is the Google Maps automatic entity-merging that combines individual practitioner Profiles into the practice Profile when NAP isn't compartmentalized. The audit catches that class of problem before it corrupts the entity data.

Cadence

Annually as a baseline. Plus on any structural event: a move, a phone-number change, a brand rename, a new associate joining or leaving, a multi-location group acquiring or divesting a location. Dental directories accumulate stale listings without an active correction cadence. For multi-location DSOs, quarterly because the per-location surface multiplies the drift. The work routes back to the SEO for dentists program as a recurring maintenance event rather than a one-time fix.

Common questions

What practice managers ask about citation audits.

01.

What does a dental citation audit actually cover?

Pull every public mention of the practice's Name, Address, Phone number across the dental-specific directory ecosystem and the broader local-citation surface. ADA Find-A-Dentist, the relevant state dental society directory, Healthgrades, ZocDoc, Yelp, Google Business Profile, Bing Places, Apple Maps, plus general-business citations (BBB, Chamber of Commerce, local newspapers). Variants get logged. The output is a ledger of every inconsistency and the fix path for each.
02.

Which citation inconsistencies actually hurt rankings?

Address discrepancies on the highest-authority surfaces (ADA Find-A-Dentist, state dental society, Google Business Profile) carry the heaviest weight. Phone-number splits across surfaces (a tracking number on the GBP and the main number elsewhere) trigger entity-disambiguation problems in Google Maps. Name variants where the legal entity name and the brand name diverge across surfaces dilute the entity signal. Stale closed locations still listed on lesser directories carry lower weight but compound over time.
03.

How often does a practice need to re-audit citations?

Annually as a baseline, plus on any structural event: a move, a phone-number change, a brand rename, a new associate joining or leaving, a multi-location group acquiring or divesting a location. Dental directories accumulate stale listings without an active correction cadence. For multi-location DSOs the cadence runs quarterly because the per-location surface multiplies the drift rate, and Google Maps' automatic entity-merging at multi-practitioner facilities introduces a recurring class of corruption.
04.

How does ADA Section 5.B govern dental reviews?

Section 5.B governs testimonials and outcome representations. Reviews that quote specific clinical outcomes ("my teeth are perfect now") trip the average-patient rule when the outcome was statistically anomalous. Reviews that imply a guaranteed result, that compare the practice to competitors with unsubstantiated superiority language, or that contain Section 5.F.2 false-or-misleading content all expose the practice. The compliant pattern surfaces reviews describing the patient experience without crossing into outcome claims.
Booking diagnostics for Q3 2026

Clean the NAP across the directory ecosystem. Surface the inconsistencies before competitor spam reports do. Book a diagnostic.

We pull your existing citations across the priority tier (ADA Find-A-Dentist, state society, GBP, specialty board directories) plus the consumer-facing tier, log every inconsistency against the canonical NAP, and ship the fix-path ledger. The diagnostic comes back inside two weeks.

Book a diagnostic

Four fields. We respond inside one business day with a few questions to make sure we can help, before either of us spends time on a call.

We use what you submit to qualify, then respond by email. We don't subscribe you to anything.